Write a PRD
Can the model turn a brief into a spec engineers could build from, including how an AI feature behaves when it is wrong?
The PM job
Writing the requirements document a team will build and test against.
Why it matters
A PRD is where ambiguity becomes either a decision or a bug. For AI products it must also say what happens when the model is uncertain or wrong. Most generated PRDs skip that part.
What good looks like
- States the user problem and the decision the PRD enables
- Specifies behaviour under uncertainty, failure and refusal
- Names eval criteria and a launch bar
- Separates must-haves from later ideas
Deliberately not measured
- Formatting or template conformance
- Length
- Visual polish of diagrams
Making product behaviour, uncertainty and eval requirements executable
A generic feature spec that ignores AI failure behaviour
Jev + blind human review
AI product PRD (core) · Conventional product PRD
Results
Every evaluated configuration on this task, all cases and repeats.
| # | Model · Harness | Task score | Jev | Martin’s | Runs | Critical failures | Cost / run | Latency |
|---|
Case viewer
Read the brief, then compare up to three outputs side by side.
Write a PRD for AI-generated meeting summaries that assign action items to attendees.
Specifies attribution confidence, editing, and what happens on mis-assignment.
- Assigns actions to non-attendees
v1.0 · synthetic · AI product, productivity